
Please word: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identification.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being info shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are consistently below fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important sources on every part from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and scientific trial variety. The sort of info that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little clarification and 0 accountability. If that feels like a conflict on girls, effectively… you’re not mistaken.
When politics begins dictating what well being info we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to struggle again. Meaning getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed girls’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t should find out about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Provided Well being Data is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being businesses just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical info. However in current months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: hundreds of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed probably the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness info is crucial to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steerage.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of important public well being info on matters corresponding to HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, scientific trial variety, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this info disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable selections about therapy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to data—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Thankfully, there are advocates on the market working to archive this info and make it out there to the general public5. This text comprises a listing of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one celebration to a different mustn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness info, it has. This alarming pattern highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Function of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Ladies’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being via coverage, schooling, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a crucial step in making certain that illnesses, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years via menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more crucial.
Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Ladies’s Well being Assets
Under is a curated checklist of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steerage tailor-made to the distinctive well being considerations of ladies of their reproductive years, through the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By searching for out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to important well being data and make sure that all girls have the data they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Mission
Trains and helps major care clinicians to broaden entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Affords free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in scientific coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based info on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Phases:
The American School of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being info. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively function of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality providers and is the biggest supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Affords rigorously vetted well being and sexuality info that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Ladies
Targeted on girls aged 35 to 64, this group offers medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome ageing and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Basic Hospital Middle for Ladies’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Data Middle
Affords reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life phases, with specialised help for BIPOC people searching for culturally aligned care.
Middle for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being via diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being info is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply necessary—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that help knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your shoppers, your healthcare suppliers. Help the organizations doing the onerous work to maintain this info alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value preventing for. As a result of it’s. At all times. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says